Liam Draxl vs William Grant Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When analyzing the recent second serve performance, Draxl has registered a commendable 42.65% of points won, whereas Grant slightly surpasses with a 43.78% success rate. In comparison to return game stats, Draxl has outperformed Grant by winning 50% of their opponent's second serve points to Grant's 47.17%. For first serve return points, the figures are 24.49% for Draxl and slightly higher at 27.32% for Grant.

Under pressure, Draxl has saved 52.04% of breakpoints in recent months. In contrast, Grant exhibits a marginally better efficiency by saving 52.99% of breakpoints faced. This breakpoint performance is an insightful metric for in-game strategy predictions.

Looking over the past year, Draxl exhibits a stronger overall performance with a win rate of 69.51% (57 wins and 25 losses), while Grant has secured a 54.69% success rate (35 wins and 29 losses). Draxl's most substantial win percentage is on indoor hard courts at 69%, while his performance declines on clay to 60%. Grant, on the other hand, fares best on indoor hard courts with a 58% win rate, declining to 50% on clay.

Draxl has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, achieving a 64.15% winning record, thereby playing at a relatively higher level. Grant, however, has focused more on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K with a 58.93% win rate. The level of competition from this angle certainly influences match outcomes.

In direct head-to-head clashes, Draxl has a clear upper hand, having won both encounters against Grant, which includes a total of 4 sets without a set loss (4-0). Their last meeting at the M15 Albuquerque tournament ended favorably for Draxl with a decisive 6-0, 6-2 victory. On average, their past matches have lasted approximately 1 hour and 9 minutes, with no previous encounters going to a deciding set or resulting in a tiebreak.

Exploring performance specifics against varied opponent quality, Draxl has faced players averaging a rank of 328.55 over the last year, above Grant’s competition average rank of 343.39. When it comes to deciding sets in matches against all opponents, Draxl has a higher conversion rate, prevailing 65% of the time compared to Grant's 56% success.

As for break point conversion rates, Draxl manages to convert 31.78% of opportunities, while Grant achieves a slightly lower conversion rate at 29.17%. This key statistic could play a crucial role in live betting opportunities during breaks.

Given the statistical landscape and previous encounters, Draxl appears to have a tactical and recent form advantage over Grant, making him the likely favorite to prevail in their upcoming matchup.